Google CEO Eric Schmidt left the Apple Computer Board, has Drew blood have been changing between the two companies. Started a conflict of interests of accusations against Schmidt, in so far as concerned the Android phone. Schmidt was the access to the strategy for the iPhone also was part of Google, through competitive phone. Yes it was!
In my opinion, Apple should have kept Schmidt because it would be better for the two companies to work closer than to go head-to-head-head ".
So he Drew blood. This week, Google said it worsened after was going kick h.264 to Curb and remove it from its Chrome browser. This man is like a Dagger in the heart of HTML 5 and the new tag video. Also includes new life Adobe Flash, the key mechanism for video transport. Why does Google do this? To create a second front from Apple? Apple has already concentrated Flash on its mobile devices, and essentially said Adobe into the Pound when calling Flash piece of crap "law. That since most movies using Flash for the provision of the web, it was rather confusing for many.
That does not prevent Flash from Apple that the main reason for the failure of the computer, or at least the main reason Why Mac fails. So Flash is verboten on the iPad and iPhone. This should not be too big a problem, since HTML 5 expected, nevertheless destroy flash. But now Google moves with it.
To me this seems like a moment of harassment. One point of Google.
When will stop or it will be increasingly Drew blood? I'm rediscovered long-term Drew blood between AMD and Intel. Over the years, they make themselves Miserable over all sorts of things from Andy Grove, exacerbating the MESS. Only recently, chaired by Paul Otellini is he ultimately reducing — after 20 years of rich lawyers.
There is a possibility that this situation with Apple and Google have only sketchy. The situation is not helped by the portable computer, or all the Google Android tablets. I'm expecting to see some sort of search engine or see the Apple team up with Microsoft and Bing support to the max with Apple Bing-Plus.
Writers, how, when these are fun, because often they are adolescents and worth mocking. This can get ugly quickly if Google actually makes some of the price of all its ideas to the cloud. But Apple, in so far as that. Featuring hot and uber-buzz. Everyone is on pins and needles, "says Steve Jobs or even is displayed. Nobody flocks to see Eric Schmidt, unless they are looking for a job or money to Google. Google does not have any vision of interesting compared to Apple. Even the idea of the cloud is a client server from crapola rehashed the 1980s. Google's key to success is the extreme functionality and utility of the unassailable.
Apple is Ferrari; Google is the Dodge minivan. One for the other cannot substitute functions. Apple is the impression. Google is workmanlike. Apple is crazy. Google's boring. Apple is the Department of art. Google is the accounting department. Both companies make money. This is the only similarity.
In the short term you can win a few battles to Google and be annoying. Apple wins in the examination as none of what Google is a real threat in any way that Apple cares about long-term is a toss up, but Apple Gets the nod will likely look at things. Just watch one single head-to-head-head "Showdown: Apple TV vs. Google TV. Who these two initiatives, and notify who wins?
Apple invented the idea and did not take it too seriously waiting for events to development (aka new technologies). Google pulled from Microsoft and Apple copied the idea, the greater (or not) and expects raves, Vosges and fireworks. You have nothing and now seems to be bailing without trying to even very hard.
In the meantime, Apple is biding his time trying to figure it all out without panicking. Apple wins.
More John C. Dvorak:
• the Why not use Facebook
• Worsens Drew blood in the Apple-Google
• stop the presses: Verizon finally gets the iPhone
• the Apple iPhone Alarm fails, the World Ends
• new year 2011 computer resolutions
• the more
Click outside the topic with John c. Dvorak.